The Air Out There - The Quest for Clean Air in Dallas-Fort Worth

 File 2941

By Julie Thibodeaux     

As Dallas-Fort Worth braces for the long hot summer, ozone alert days are also popping into the forecast. Those are days when ozone levels are expected to rise to unhealthy levels as designated by Environmental Protection Agency standards.

There are two distinct ozone layers affecting the Earth. A layer of naturally occurring ozone gas forms about 10 miles up in the air, protecting the Earth from harmful ultraviolet rays. Man-made ozone is created at ground level when volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxide pollutants “cook” with sunlight and heat. Low-wind and stagnant high-pressure systems are also factors. That’s why those hot, sunny, windless summer days produce ozone alerts.File 2940

The Dallas-Fort Worth region has a long history of being in nonattainment of ozone standards set by the EPA under the Clean Air Act. 

However, Terry Clawson, spokesperson for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, said across the state, the air quality has steadily improved over the years despite development. Stricter vehicle inspection tests, cleaner cars on the road and industry regulations have helped bring the levels down.

“Last summer was bad. It interrupted that trend. However, we have every confidence, the downward trend will continue,” he said.

The current federal ozone level standard is 75 parts per billion while the 10-county North Texas region emits 87 ppb, a number based on a formula calculated and averaged over three years. 

High concentrations of ozone can cause shortness of breath, coughing or wheezing, headaches, nausea or throat and lung irritation.

So far in 2012, the Dallas-Fort Worth area has had 13 days designated as Level Orange ozone days, which is considered unhealthy for sensitive people, including children and those with lung disease. The area has undergone two days at Level Red, defined as unhealthy for all. Last year, the region spent 40 days at Orange Level or above.

According to Shannon Stevenson, spokesperson for the North Central Texas Council of Governments, the DFW region has a tougher time than other metropolitan areas in the U.S. because of its climate plus its position downwind from outside sources of pollution, such as Houston and the power plants south and east of Dallas.

Ozone levels are tracked by 20 monitors scattered across North Texas. The air quality typically varies across the Metroplex. Those areas with significant pollution sources such as industrial plants or heavy traffic may have higher readings. However, wind is a factor and can blow ozone into or out of an area resulting in even rural areas with high readings. (See current ozone readings at http://www.tceq.texas.gov/cgi-bin/compliance/monops/select_curlev.pl?region04_cur.gif)

According to NCTCOG, as much as 49 percent of emissions that contribute to ozone in DFW comes from cars and trucks. Nonroad engine sources, which includes construction equipment, airplanes, trains and lawnmowers, account for 27 percent. Industry sources, such as cement kilns, power plants and chemical plants, produce 14 percent. Commercial businesses, such as dry cleaners, paint shops and bakeries, make up 5 percent. An additional 5 percent comes from oil and gas drilling and production, a new category being tracked.

Stevenson said in the past, monitors in the north Dallas and Frisco areas have had the highest readings of the region but the plume seems to be shifting west. Now the Keller and Eagle Mountain Lake areas are topping the list. Researchers say the high ozone levels could be due to wind patterns. However, there’s also speculation that it’s caused by gas drilling in the Barnett Shale. 

Jim Schermbeck, director of Downwinders at Risk, an air-quality watchdog group, is concerned that gas drilling is contributing to increased ozone levels. 

“The further east the drilling goes, we’re seeing that the monitors are tripping,” he said. “It’s circumstantial evidence but it suggests there’s a correlation between the rise of gas drilling and rise of ozone levels surrounding those sites.”

Schermbeck is a member of Dallas Residents at Risk (http://dallasresidentsatrisk.com), a coalition that includes the Dallas Sierra Club and Texas Campaign for the Environment. The group is pushing for the city of Dallas to require the gas industry to offset its emissions, providing the industry with an incentive to further reduce them. Schermbeck, who has led efforts over two decades to force cement plants in Ellis County to curb ozone-producing emissions, added that both cement and coal plants should do more to cap pollutants.

Stevenson said while the NCTCOG does not have authority to regulate local industry, it is making efforts to reduce ozone levels in North Texas with programs geared to mobile sources of pollution. 

“I’m happy to say, we’re doing a lot,” said Stevenson. “There’s a ton of
programs aimed at reducing emissions.”

Since 2009, NCTCOG and the Regional Transportation Council have awarded
File 2942$20 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grants to purchase alternative fuel vehicles, upgrade vehicles with emissions-reducing technologies and build alternative fuel infrastructure. 


(Photo: Mass transit options are one way in which NTCOG and other organizations will seek to clean up Dallas's air)

Other efforts include implementing idling restrictions for trucks, upgrading school buses and educating the public on how they can reduce ozone. 

On July 7, NCTCOG is hosting a Clean Air Day, between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., to encourage residents to make pollution-reducing choices such as car pooling, biking instead of driving or telecommuting.  

Stevenson said these acts are small steps but if more people change their habits, real change could result.

“We’ve already reached out for the low-hanging fruit,” she said. “To get to that next level, everyone’s going to have to pitch in.”

For more information on air quality in Texas, including ozone maps, alternative fueling stations and grant programs, seewww.nctcog.org and www.tceq.state.tx.us.


Sign up for the weekly Green Source DFW Newsletter to stay up to date on everything green in North Texas, the latest news and events. Julie Thibodeaux is a Fort Worth-based writer covering environmental issues, green topics and sustainable living. Previously, she worked as an editor and writer at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Contact her at julie@jthibodeaux.com.

Your rating: None Average: 4.5 (2 votes)

Comments

Jim Schermbeck

I believe this piece contains a number of misleading statements by TCEQ and NCTCOG representatives that can easily be checked online: 1) "The downwind trend" that Mr Clawson of TCEQ says has only been interrupted, is, in fact continuing, and he knows this because it's TCEQ monitoring that's proving it. This last March saw the highest ozone levels ever recorded for that month since TCEQ air quality monitoring began in 1997. It's only June and there are already two monitors whose design value is above 85. The "best ever" ozone summer we were suppose to experience this year, according to TCEQ's prediction to EPA submitted in December, is completely off the rails. Please check out our post on Reality vs TCEC this summer so far: http://www.downwindersatrisk.org/2012/07/how-wrong-is-tceq-about-smog-in-dfw-this-year/ 2) The "87 ppb" Design Value Mr. Clawson cites is from 2010. Last year it was 92 ppb - at the Keller monitor. This year so far, the Keller monitor is already at a Design Value (3-year running avg) of 87, a violation of the old std and something TCEQ said would not happen. 3) The NCTCOG claim that,"the DFW region has a tougher time than other metropolitan areas in the U.S. because of its climate plus its position downwind from outside sources of pollution" is also misleading. Houston is a hotspot for bad air, and yet last year DFW exceeded the number of bad air days and the severity of the violations in that city. Other metropolitan ares downwind of power plants as well as DFW, and yet they've all manged to do better in achieving cleaner air. Atlanta, Phoenix, and other Sunbelt cities that started out at the same smoggy spot a decade ago have all conquered the old 85 ppb std. DFW has not. It's already blown it again this year. Instead of blaming climate or coal plants, it is more realistic to blame DFW's air quality failure on a lack of political will by local and state officials to get serious about decreasing air pollution. However, there is one large area of policy where the excuses of lack of will and new downwind sources collide: in the official lack of attention paid to the rise of Barnett and Haynesville Shale gas pollution as a source of smog in DFW. For more information. please see our post on Freestone County gas industry emissions and how they might be impacting DFW ozone levels - http://www.downwindersatrisk.org/2012/06/you-dont-need-a-tceq-to-know-which-way-the-wind-blows/ 4) The statement that only "5 percent" of the smog-forming emissions in DFW come from oil and gas drilling and production is also highly misleading. First, we know this is one of the fastest-growing categories of air pollution over the last decade. The increase in gas pollution is erasing decreases in emissions from other sources. Second, according to the information submitted by TCEQ to EPA last December, oil and gas emissions are the second largest source (20%) of smog-forming Volatile Organic Compounds, or VOCs in the 9-county DFW non-attainment area. That's more than the total VOCs produced by all on-=road vehicles in the same 9 county area. Based on recent field studies by NOAA and others, this is probably an underestimate. This statement also ignore the impact of gas emissions to the south and east of DFW, like Freestone County's, that are not included in the 9-county area inventory, but are probably influencing air pollution here. What's always left out of this pie chart is the fact that cars now have a removal efficiency of approximately 90%. No other major sources come close to that kind of effort, despite technology being available to achieve it - at cement kilns, gas operations. and coal plants. That's where "the lowest hanging fruit" remains. But since all those industries are large contributors to the politicians directing the status quo, there's no political will to target them. Exhibit A: the 2011 DFW clean air plan submitted by the state, which relies primarily on marketplace forces to replace old cars with new ones, instead of any new round of pollution controls for any industry sources. 5) The NCTCOG claim that "monitors in the north Dallas and Frisco areas have had the highest readings of the region but the plume seems to be shifting west" is also based on old data from two-three years ago. In fact, the OPPOSITE is occurring. Violating monitors are moving EAST (just like gas mining). And there are more of them. From 2008 to 2010, Eagle Mountain Lake and Keller were the epicenter of smog in DFW. But in 2011, while Keller tripped the std, EML did not. Moreover, during that same 08-10 period there were only 1-3 monitors in violation of that std. Last year, there were seven. And they included not just Keller, but Denton, Grapevine, Pilot Point, Frisco and North Dallas - directly in contradiction to the NCTCOG claim. This year, the very first monitor to record four "exceedances" of the 85ppb std was located near Mockingbird and I-35 in Central Dallas - the first time that monitor has done so since 2005. Moreover, the fourth exceedance came in June - the earliest that has happened since 2006, when 12 out of 19 monitors were in violation at the end of the summer. For more information, please see this post: http://www.downwindersatrisk.org/2012/06/happy-ozone-non-attainment-day/ As much as the officials and agencies would like us all to ignore the summer of 2011 and think of it as an aberration, it would be more prudent to see it as another warning sign that DFW needs to do much more to get safe and legal air.

Post new comment

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.